[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5579B3C7.5030305@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:13:59 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] clocksource: bcm2835: Migrate to new 'set-state'
interface
On 06/11/2015 06:00 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-06-15, 17:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Please mention in the log you removed the RESUME because it does
>> nothing and the core code will just ignore it.
>
> Okay.
>
>> The patch is ok but there is an inconsistency on how are handled the
>> different callbacks. tick_resume can be omitted but not
>> state_shutdown and state_oneshot forcing the drivers to define empty
>> functions.
>
> It was done because they are thought to be compulsory, but even I
> am not sure if we should make all callbacks as optional.
Yes, I think it would make sense to ignore NULL callback in
__clockevents_set_state, otherwise we will end up to fill the different
drivers with duplicated noop functions.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists