[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150611162726.GE4386@linux>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:57:27 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] clocksource: bcm2835: Migrate to new 'set-state'
interface
Hi Thomas,
On 11-06-15, 18:13, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Yes, I think it would make sense to ignore NULL callback in
> __clockevents_set_state, otherwise we will end up to fill the
> different drivers with duplicated noop functions.
Do you suggest the same ?
Thanks.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists