linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] Convert the posix_clock_operations and k

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506121512180.3786@nanos>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:16:11 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
cc:	arnd@...db.de, john.stultz@...aro.org, heenasirwani@...il.com,
	pang.xunlei@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	richardcochran@...il.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, linux390@...ibm.com, rth@...ddle.net,
	riel@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, tj@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	ahh@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	serge@...lyn.com, pmoore@...hat.com, tiwai@...e.de,
	jeffv@...gle.com, jlayton@...marydata.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, mark.d.rustad@...el.com,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, y2038@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] Convert the posix_clock_operations and k_clock
 structure to ready for 2038

On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:

Sigh. Again threading of the series failed. Some patches are, the
whole series is not. Can you please get your tools straight?

You neither managed to cc me on the security patch.

> - Modify the subject line and the changelog:

>   timekeeping: Change the implementation of timekeeping_clocktai()

Sigh. How is that better than the previous one? It's more accurate,
but equally useless.

And of course you did not address my request to change the macro mess
in

>   posix-timers: Introduce {get,put}_timespec and {get,put}_itimerspec

according to the discussion with Arnd.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/