[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4ku+yt=DWctKj+S4mTCKna-CyfXkhJhWLkJecBBXed39A7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:27:53 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Heena Sirwani <heenasirwani@...il.com>,
Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@...aro.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
linux390@...ibm.com, rth@...ddle.net, riel@...hat.com,
cl@...ux.com, tj@...nel.org,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
Jeffrey Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, mark.d.rustad@...el.com,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] Convert the posix_clock_operations and k_clock
structure to ready for 2038
On 12 June 2015 at 21:16, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
> Sigh. Again threading of the series failed. Some patches are, the
> whole series is not. Can you please get your tools straight?
>
> You neither managed to cc me on the security patch.
>
>> - Modify the subject line and the changelog:
>
>> timekeeping: Change the implementation of timekeeping_clocktai()
>
> Sigh. How is that better than the previous one? It's more accurate,
> but equally useless.
>
> And of course you did not address my request to change the macro mess
> in
>
>> posix-timers: Introduce {get,put}_timespec and {get,put}_itimerspec
>
> according to the discussion with Arnd.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your comments, and i'll fix these problems you point out.
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists