[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150612133025.GG14408@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:30:26 -0400
From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
To: lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com
Cc: mchehab@....samsung.com, dougthompson@...ssion.com, bp@...en8.de,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Snow <jim.m.snow@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sb_edac: virtualize several hard-coded functions
Hi Jim, Lukasz,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:43:11PM +0200, lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com wrote:
> @@ -273,6 +270,10 @@ struct sbridge_info {
> u64 (*get_tolm)(struct sbridge_pvt *pvt);
> u64 (*get_tohm)(struct sbridge_pvt *pvt);
> u64 (*rir_limit)(u32 reg);
> + u64 (*sad_limit)(u32 reg);
> + u32 (*interleave_mode)(u32 reg);
> + char* (*show_interleave_mode)(u32 reg);
> + u32 (*dram_attr)(u32 reg);
> const u32 *dram_rule;
> const u32 *interleave_list;
> const struct interleave_pkg *interleave_pkg;
the only reason these exist is for when there's a difference between
memory controllers:
> pvt->info.get_memory_type = get_memory_type;
> pvt->info.get_memory_type = get_memory_type;
> pvt->info.get_memory_type = haswell_get_memory_type;
until then such change isn't really necessary.
--
Aristeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists