[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150613174527.GA29379@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:45:27 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mml@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: Enable and use the arch_pgd_init_late()
method
On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Afaics, we need to ensure that:
> > >
> > > > + if (pgd_val(*pgd_src))
> > > > + WRITE_ONCE(*pgd_dst, *pgd_src);
> > >
> > > either we notice the recent update of this PGD, or (say) the subsequent
> > > sync_global_pgds() can miss the child.
> > >
> > > How the write barrier can help?
> >
> > So the real thing this pairs with is the earlier:
> >
> > tsk->mm = mm;
> >
> > plus the linking of the new task in the task list.
> >
> > _that_ write must become visible to others before we do the (conditional) copy
> > ourselves.
Hmm. that write must be visible before we start to _read_ *pgd_src,
afaics.
> > Granted, it happens quite a bit earlier, and the task linking's use of locking
> > is a natural barrier - but since this is lockless I didn't want to leave a
> > silent assumption in.
I agree,
> Ah, there's another detail I forgot. This might handle the fork case, but in
> exec() we have:
>
> tsk->mm = mm;
> arch_pgd_init_late(mm);
Yes, this too.
But wmb() can't help. At least we need the full mb() to serialize the
STORE above (or list addition in copy_process) with the LOAD which
reads *pgd_src.
Plus we need another mb() in sync_global_pgds(), say, before the main
for_each_process() loop.
it would be nice to make this more simple/clear somehow...
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists