[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615124852.GC3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:48:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, will.auld@...el.com,
linux-rdt@...ists.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation
detection
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:17:12AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> + /* Additional Intel-defined flags: level 0x00000010 */
> + if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000010) {
> + u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + c->x86_capability[13] = ebx;
> +
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3)) {
> +
> + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + c->x86_rdt_max_closid = edx + 1;
> + c->x86_rdt_max_cbm_len = eax + 1;
> + }
> + }
I'm still annoyed by the whole RDT/CAT thing, so the above reads a CAT
leaf and puts the values in an RDT variable.
That's inconsistent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists