[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506161143500.32420@vshiva-Udesk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, matt.fleming@...el.com, will.auld@...el.com,
linux-rdt@...ists.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86/intel_rdt: Hot cpu support for Cache
Allocation
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>> +static inline void intel_rdt_cpu_start(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_pqr_state *state = &per_cpu(pqr_state, cpu);
>> +
>> + state->closid = 0;
>> + mutex_lock(&rdt_group_mutex);
>
> This is called from CPU_STARTING, which runs on the starting cpu with
> interrupts disabled. Clearly never tested with any of the mandatory
> debug configs enabled.
But this can race with cbm_update_all calling on_each_cpu_mask ? or in other
words the lock helps on_each_cpu_mask not race with hot cpu code updating the
rdt_cpumask since the on_each_cpu_mask is also called with the lock always.
Its tested on the 0 day build which should include the debug config. Will add a
tested tag.
Thanks,
Vikas
>
> Thanks
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists