[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506162123141.4120@nanos>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, matt.fleming@...el.com,
will.auld@...el.com, linux-rdt@...ists.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86/intel_rdt: Hot cpu support for Cache
Allocation
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> > > +static inline void intel_rdt_cpu_start(int cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct intel_pqr_state *state = &per_cpu(pqr_state, cpu);
> > > +
> > > + state->closid = 0;
> > > + mutex_lock(&rdt_group_mutex);
> >
> > This is called from CPU_STARTING, which runs on the starting cpu with
> > interrupts disabled. Clearly never tested with any of the mandatory
> > debug configs enabled.
>
> But this can race with cbm_update_all calling on_each_cpu_mask ? or in other
> words the lock helps on_each_cpu_mask not race with hot cpu code updating the
> rdt_cpumask since the on_each_cpu_mask is also called with the lock always.
>
> Its tested on the 0 day build which should include the debug config. Will add
> a tested tag.
And that tag gives you special permission to take a mutex in irq
disabled context on a cpu which cannot schedule, right?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists