linux-kernel - Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct acpi_table_tpm2 and acpi_tpm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201506162246.51398.PeterHuewe@gmx.de>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:46:50 +0200
From:	Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
	<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct acpi_table_tpm2 and acpi_tpm2_control

Hi Jarkko

> > > >Betreff: [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct acpi_table_tpm2 and
> > > >acpi_tpm2_control
> > > but are the names there still correct? Isn't this information outdated?
> > > The acpi spec refers to the MS spec which is not present anymore, and
> > > MS refers to the TCG -- and in the PTP your names are used.
> > > 
> > > ---> We should update the ACPI header?
> > > At least the naming for reserved and error.
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > I think you are right. It does not make sense to degrade here. 

so I'm waiting on the new version depending on the updated acpi header?

Thanks,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/