linux-kernel - Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct acpi_table_tpm2 and acpi_tpm2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150622130400.GB6048@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:04:00 +0300
From:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
To:	Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
	<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct
 acpi_table_tpm2 and acpi_tpm2_control

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Hi Jarkko
> 
> > > > >Betreff: [PATCH] tpm, tpm_crb: migrate to struct acpi_table_tpm2 and
> > > > >acpi_tpm2_control
> > > > but are the names there still correct? Isn't this information outdated?
> > > > The acpi spec refers to the MS spec which is not present anymore, and
> > > > MS refers to the TCG -- and in the PTP your names are used.
> > > > 
> > > > ---> We should update the ACPI header?
> > > > At least the naming for reserved and error.
> > > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > I think you are right. It does not make sense to degrade here. 
> 
> so I'm waiting on the new version depending on the updated acpi header?

Yes. I'll submit a new patch later on when new arrives come from ACPICA.
You can ignore this until then.

> Thanks,
> Peter

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/