[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558275F1.5020100@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:40:33 +0200
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
To: ext Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/i2c/mux: Add register based mux i2c-mux-reg
Hi!
On 17/06/15 18:03, ext Paul Bolle wrote:
>> You do not see the platform_device, because there are no users yet, put
>> > this MODULE_ALIAS() is perfectly fine, it will allow automatic module loading
>> > in non-DT case.
> Do you mean that it will allow automatic module loading once the patch
> that adds a struct platform_device with a "i2c-mux-reg" name lands?
Any platform code which will register the platform_device will trigger uevent and
udevd will be able to find the module with this macro. This is a legacy alternative
to device-tree approach.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists