linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1434640312.2385.112.camel@x220>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:11:52 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mturquette@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver

Hi Alexandre,

You know, I can't read Nicolas' mind, so I couldn't say from the patch
itself that it was not a silly mistake.

I also can't look into the future. I can however check lkml (at least
the few weeks of lkml I keep at hand) and see whether there's another
patch pending that would allow this driver to build.

Discussing those two disabilities doesn't require a (much broader)
discussion on how Atmel goes about their Linux business. At least, I
hope it doesn't, because I don't actually have an opinion in that
matter.

Thanks,

Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/