[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5582DF03.7010109@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:08:51 -0700
From: York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
<wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] driver/i2c/mux: Add register based mux i2c-mux-reg
On 06/18/2015 05:35 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 17/06/15 23:13, ext York Sun wrote:
>> + switch (mux->data.reg_size) {
>> + case 4:
>> + iowrite32(mux->data.values[chan], mux->data.reg);
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + iowrite16(mux->data.values[chan], mux->data.reg);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + iowrite8(mux->data.values[chan], mux->data.reg);
>> + break;
>
> I'd like to see at least [optional] read-back operation after each write.
Maybe I should add ioread after each write without using an option. I want to
avoid additional option if possible.
> And if you stick with iowrite*(), maybe it desires a comment (in the Documentation/ file?),
> that write will be little-Endian, therefore BE users must take care...
I am consulting with my colleagues. If I cannot come up with a native endianess
solution, I will keep using iowrite and add a comment.
>
> Other than that it looks good to me...
>
Thanks.
York
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists