[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D84FDA78-0167-4636-BAB8-2A9AD36AE4F1@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:41:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename various 'IA32' uses in arch/x86/ code
The issue with that is that "compat" is a cross-architecture feature of the kernel to handle *some* 32-on-64 bit ABI translations. x32 uses *some* but not all of the compat machinery.
It is already confusing when you introduce more than two ABIs (e.g. x32 or MIPS n32) and we need a way to be able to be specific. I suggest using i386 or just use ia32 as a legacy symbol name.
On June 18, 2015 11:14:45 AM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Jun 18, 2015 7:49 AM, "Brian Gerst" <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> As long as there is no confusion between this and X32, I am fine with
>it.
>
>I would suggest that we use "compat" for the traditional 32-bit x86
>code,
>and x32 for the x32/ones. That sounds very natural and unambiguous to
>me..
>
> Linus
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists