linux-kernel - Re: Coding style details (checkpatch)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:54:27 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
Cc:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Coding style details (checkpatch)

On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 12:52 +0200, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > Ah, right. One might say that this is a false positive, but that's up
> > to Joe or Andy I guess.
> >
> > It may be valid C code, but I think this construction is slightly
> > funky to begin with.
> >
> > Which file is this?
> 
> A new file, not yet sent anywhere.

How is the macro used?
#define REG8_1(a0) ((const u16[8]){a0, a0 + 1, a0 + 2, a0 + 3})


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/