[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506201824510.2067@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 18:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm/slab_common: allow NULL cache pointer in
kmem_cache_destroy()
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/17/15 16:14), David Rientjes wrote:
> [..]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583
> >
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> >
> > kmem_cache_destroy() isn't a fastpath, this is long overdue. Now where's
> > the patch to remove the NULL checks from the callers? ;)
> >
>
> Thanks.
>
> Yes, Julia Lawall (Cc'd) already has a patch set ready for submission.
The patch for making these functions able to tolerate NULL doesn't seem to
be in linux-next yet, so I will wait until it appears.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists