[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150714160300.e59bec100e2ba090bc5e2107@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:03:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Add some <foo>_destroy functions to
NEEDLESS_IF tests
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 22:52:29 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> Sergey Senozhatsky has modified several destroy functions that can
> now be called with NULL values.
>
> - kmem_cache_destroy()
> - mempool_destroy()
> - dma_pool_destroy()
>
> Update checkpatch to warn when those functions are preceded by an if.
>
> Update checkpatch to --fix all the calls too only when the code style
> form is using leading tabs.
>
> from:
> if (foo)
> <func>(foo);
> to:
> <func>(foo);
There's also zpool_destroy_pool() and zs_destroy_pool(). Did we decide
they're not worth bothering about?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists