[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150715002743.GB742@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:27:43 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Add some <foo>_destroy functions to
NEEDLESS_IF tests
On (07/14/15 16:03), Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Sergey Senozhatsky has modified several destroy functions that can
> > now be called with NULL values.
> >
> > - kmem_cache_destroy()
> > - mempool_destroy()
> > - dma_pool_destroy()
> >
> > Update checkpatch to warn when those functions are preceded by an if.
> >
> > Update checkpatch to --fix all the calls too only when the code style
> > form is using leading tabs.
> >
> > from:
> > if (foo)
> > <func>(foo);
> > to:
> > <func>(foo);
>
> There's also zpool_destroy_pool() and zs_destroy_pool(). Did we decide
> they're not worth bothering about?
Correct. Those two are very unlikely will see any significant number
of users so, I think, we can drop the patches that touch zspool and
zsmalloc destructors.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists