[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJoeN4O6Cc1Wsm+Ev+K6sT0PqNq1QtX-ZQp1ePGVUbiPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:25:26 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: altera: fix return value of altera_gpio_remove()
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> The remove callback never succeeds, which seems odd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> I wonder why nobody has pointed this out before me.
> I am suspecting -EIO might be intentional.
> I hope some Altera guys will give me comments.
>
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> index c653c83..5861550 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int altera_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> of_mm_gpiochip_remove(&altera_gc->mmchip);
>
> - return -EIO;
> + return 0;
That looks weird indeed. Tien, can you comment on this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists