linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: altera: fix return value of altera_gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1434936985.20199.8.camel@ubuntu>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:36:25 -0700
From:	Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
CC:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: altera: fix return value of
 altera_gpio_remove()

Sorry I was away from my mail for the past few weeks. 
This isn't intentional, should be a bug I overlook. The fix is correct.

On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 16:25 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> > The remove callback never succeeds, which seems odd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I wonder why nobody has pointed this out before me.
> > I am suspecting -EIO might be intentional.
> > I hope some Altera guys will give me comments.
> >
> >
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> > index c653c83..5861550 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-altera.c
> > @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int altera_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >         of_mm_gpiochip_remove(&altera_gc->mmchip);
> >
> > -       return -EIO;
> > +       return 0;
> 
> That looks weird indeed. Tien, can you comment on this?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/