[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZCHxqkLO5ox2em7guJdp3x-wyP9CZRC656HcZPcptNLCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:57:43 +0300
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@...il.com>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
"octavian.purdila@...el.com" <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: Fix parameters in iio_triggered_buffer_setup
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 11/06/15 13:06, Cristina Opriceana wrote:
>> This patch renames the top half handler and the bottom half handler
>> of iio_triggered_buffer_setup() in accordance with their usage.
>> The names of the parameters were swapped, thus creating confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@...il.com>
> Good point. This is definitely misleading. I wonder if the _th naming
> is a good idea anymore though given that the bottom half (in the traditional
> sense) is now a thread based call and hence the th might be confusing?
> Perhaps the h and thread naming used in the pollfunc code would be clearer?
>
Sounds like a good idea. Cristina can prepare a patch for this.
> Lars, this bit was yours originally. Any thoughts?
Lets wait for Lars thoughts on this.
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists