[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5587C6AB.8070903@metafoo.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:26:19 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@...il.com>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"octavian.purdila@...el.com" <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: Fix parameters in iio_triggered_buffer_setup
On 06/21/2015 03:57 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On 11/06/15 13:06, Cristina Opriceana wrote:
>>> This patch renames the top half handler and the bottom half handler
>>> of iio_triggered_buffer_setup() in accordance with their usage.
>>> The names of the parameters were swapped, thus creating confusion.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@...il.com>
>> Good point. This is definitely misleading. I wonder if the _th naming
>> is a good idea anymore though given that the bottom half (in the traditional
>> sense) is now a thread based call and hence the th might be confusing?
>> Perhaps the h and thread naming used in the pollfunc code would be clearer?
>>
>
> Sounds like a good idea. Cristina can prepare a patch for this.
>
>> Lars, this bit was yours originally. Any thoughts?
Jonathan, that's your naming convention I merely added the wrapper function.
I'm OK with changing the naming.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists