linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Create a common helper to determine an inode label [ver #3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9305.1434966107@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:41:47 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	SELinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Create a common helper to determine an inode label [ver #3]

Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:

> This patch looks fine to me and I think there is an advantage to merging this 
> regardless of what happens with the "unioning" work so I'm inclined to queue 
> this up now unless you would prefer to resubmit with the union patches?

If you could queue it up now, that'd be great!

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/