| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150622114511.GA28340@linux>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:15:11 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Pi-Cheng Chen <pi-cheng.chen@...aro.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: mediatek: Add MT8173 cpufreq driver
On 08-06-15, 20:29, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I have been quite busy recently.
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mt8173-cpufreq.c
> +static LIST_HEAD(cpu_dvfs_info_list);
> +
> +static inline struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *to_mtk_cpu_dvfs_info(
> + struct list_head *list)
> +{
> + return list_entry(list, struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info, node);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_add(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info)
> +{
> + list_add(&info->node, &cpu_dvfs_info_list);
> +}
No stupid wrappers please. Doesn't make anything better.
> +
> +static struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_get(int cpu)
A very bad name to a routine with very specific functionality.
> +{
> + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> + struct list_head *list;
> +
> + list_for_each(list, &cpu_dvfs_info_list) {
> + info = to_mtk_cpu_dvfs_info(list);
> +
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, info->cpus))
> + return info;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release(void)
> +{
> + struct list_head *list, *tmp;
> + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(list, tmp, &cpu_dvfs_info_list) {
> + info = to_mtk_cpu_dvfs_info(list);
> +
> + dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(info->cpu_dev,
> + &info->freq_table);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(info->proc_reg))
> + regulator_put(info->proc_reg);
> + if (!IS_ERR(info->sram_reg))
> + regulator_put(info->sram_reg);
> + if (!IS_ERR(info->cpu_clk))
> + clk_put(info->cpu_clk);
> + if (!IS_ERR(info->inter_clk))
> + clk_put(info->inter_clk);
> +
> + of_free_opp_table(info->cpu_dev);
> +
> + list_del(list);
> + kfree(info);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#define MIN(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
> +#define MAX(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
Look for these in kernel.h
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int vproc)
> +{
> + if (info->need_voltage_trace)
> + return mtk_cpufreq_voltage_trace(info, vproc);
> + else
> + return regulator_set_voltage(info->proc_reg, vproc,
> + vproc + VOLT_TOL);
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int index)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = policy->freq_table;
> + struct clk *cpu_clk = policy->clk;
> + struct clk *armpll = clk_get_parent(cpu_clk);
> + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info = policy->driver_data;
> + struct device *cpu_dev = info->cpu_dev;
> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> + long freq_hz, old_freq_hz;
> + int vproc, old_vproc, inter_vproc, target_vproc, ret;
> +
> + inter_vproc = info->intermediate_voltage;
> +
> + old_freq_hz = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk);
> + old_vproc = regulator_get_voltage(info->proc_reg);
> +
> + freq_hz = freq_table[index].frequency * 1000;
A blank line here.
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &freq_hz);
> + if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to find OPP for %ld\n",
> + policy->cpu, freq_hz);
> + return PTR_ERR(opp);
> + }
> + vproc = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + /*
> + * If the new voltage or the intermediate voltage is higher than the
> + * current voltage, scale up voltage first.
> + */
> + target_vproc = (inter_vproc > vproc) ? inter_vproc : vproc;
> + if (old_vproc < target_vproc) {
> + ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, target_vproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to scale up voltage!\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, old_vproc);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Reparent the CPU clock to intermediate clock. */
> + ret = clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, info->inter_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to re-parent cpu clock!\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, old_vproc);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set the original PLL to target rate. */
> + ret = clk_set_rate(armpll, freq_hz);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to scale cpu clock rate!\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, armpll);
> + mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, old_vproc);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set parent of CPU clock back to the original PLL. */
> + ret = clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, armpll);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to re-parent cpu clock!\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, inter_vproc);
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the new voltage is lower than the intermediate voltage or the
> + * original voltage, scale down to the new voltage.
> + */
> + if (vproc < inter_vproc || vproc < old_vproc) {
> + ret = mtk_cpufreq_set_voltage(info, vproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("cpu%d: failed to scale down voltage!\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> + clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, info->inter_clk);
> + clk_set_rate(armpll, old_freq_hz);
> + clk_set_parent(cpu_clk, armpll);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> + int ret;
> +
> + info = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_get(policy->cpu);
> + if (!info) {
> + pr_err("%s: mtk cpu dvfs info for cpu%d is not initialized\n",
> + __func__, policy->cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, info->freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: invalid frequency table: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, info->cpus);
> + policy->driver_data = info;
> + policy->clk = info->cpu_clk;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_driver mt8173_cpufreq_driver = {
> + .flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
> + .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
> + .target_index = mtk_cpufreq_set_target,
> + .get = cpufreq_generic_get,
> + .init = mtk_cpufreq_init,
> + .name = "mtk-cpufreq",
> + .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
> +};
> +
> +static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct device *cpu_dev;
> + struct regulator *proc_reg = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + struct regulator *sram_reg = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + struct clk *cpu_clk = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + struct clk *inter_clk = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> + struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info;
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> + unsigned long rate;
> + int ret;
> +
> + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_dev) {
> + pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_init_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("no OPP table for cpu%d\n", cpu);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + cpu_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "cpu");
> + if (IS_ERR(cpu_clk)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(cpu_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + pr_warn("cpu clk for cpu%d not ready, retry.\n", cpu);
> + else
> + pr_err("failed to get cpu clk for cpu%d\n", cpu);
> +
> + ret = PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
> + goto out_free_opp_table;
> + }
> +
> + inter_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "intermediate");
> + if (IS_ERR(inter_clk)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(inter_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + pr_warn("intermediate clk for cpu%d not ready, retry.\n",
> + cpu);
> + else
> + pr_err("failed to get intermediate clk for cpu%d\n",
> + cpu);
> +
> + ret = PTR_ERR(cpu_clk);
> + goto out_free_resources;
> + }
> +
> + proc_reg = regulator_get_exclusive(cpu_dev, "proc");
> + if (IS_ERR(proc_reg)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(proc_reg) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + pr_warn("proc regulator for cpu%d not ready, retry.\n",
> + cpu);
> + else
> + pr_err("failed to get proc regulator for cpu%d\n",
> + cpu);
> +
> + ret = PTR_ERR(proc_reg);
> + goto out_free_resources;
> + }
> +
> + /* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */
> + sram_reg = regulator_get_exclusive(cpu_dev, "sram");
> +
> + info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free_resources;
> + }
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("failed to init cpufreq table for cpu%d: %d\n",
> + cpu, ret);
> + goto out_free_mtk_cpu_dvfs_info;
> + }
> +
> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&info->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
Why getting into such trouble? What about just saving policy's pointer
in info and use it for freq_table, cpus mask, etc ?
> + goto out_free_cpufreq_table;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int mt8173_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + /*
> + * If the struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info for the cpu power domain
> + * is already initialized, skip this CPU.
> + */
> + if (!mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_get(cpu)) {
> + ret = mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(cpu);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + pr_err("%s probe fail\n", __func__);
> +
> + mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release();
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&mt8173_cpufreq_driver);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("failed to register mtk cpufreq driver\n");
> + mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release();
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mt8173_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "mt8173-cpufreq",
> + },
> + .probe = mt8173_cpufreq_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(mt8173_cpufreq_platdrv);
> +
> +static int mt8173_cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> +
> + if (!of_machine_is_compatible("mediatek,mt8173"))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("mt8173-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
> + pr_err("failed to register mtk-cpufreq platform device\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +module_init(mt8173_cpufreq_driver_init);
Can this driver be built as module? Why this module* crap all over the
place?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists