[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506231214490.4037@nanos>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:15:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@...eBSD.org>
cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: clockevents_shutdown vs pending interrupt
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Pardon if I am asking something obvious or silly...
>
> tick_check_new_device() has the following code:
>
> if (tick_is_broadcast_device(curdev)) {
> clockevents_shutdown(curdev);
> curdev = NULL;
> }
>
> and
>
> void clockevents_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *dev)
> {
> clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN);
> dev->next_event.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
> }
>
> This is all done while interrupts are disabled on the current CPU.
> But what if there is already a pending interrupt from the current source?
> Is it possible that the timer interrupt would be processed by the device that
> was put in the shutdown mode?
>
> Some context: I am experiencing exactly the same symptoms as described here
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1483297. But I run a kernel where
> that bug is fixed. And my problem happens in a VM, so it's possible that there
> are timing issues which are very unlikely on real hardware.
Can you provide a full dmesg please?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists