[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFB918064C.F72245F4-ONC1257E6E.00287EC7-C1257E6E.00299EF2@alitech.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:36:43 +0200
From: christian.ruppert@...tech.com
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>,
Fabio Mello <fabio.mello@...el.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: use enable on resume instead initialization
Dear Lucas,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com> wrote on 23.06.2015 19:02:03:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:45 PM, <christian.ruppert@...tech.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Christian Ruppert/ALi_GVA/ALi wrote on 10.06.2015 17:05:16:
> [...]
> > The result is not very encouraging: Out of five (identical) designware
i2c
> > controllers we have on my test SOC, the first one initialises properly
but
> > the second one gets stuck in the famous irq loop right away when the
> > module is enabled in i2c_dw_init. The system never gets around to try
>
> Are you using the pci or platform driver? I noticed yesterday the pci
> version is failing here with a NULL pointer dereference.
The test was performed with the platform driver (instantiated through
device tree).
I just re-checked and the ultimate problem which hangs/kills the system in
my case is the IRQ loop.
I haven't observed any NULL pointer dereferences on the road.
Greetings,
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists