linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where wakeup is flexible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1506241035020.1393-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:35:38 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Sunny Kumar <sunny.kumar.roy@...il.com>
cc:	mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: usleep_range is preferred over udelay where
 wakeup is flexible

Please don't top-post.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sunny Kumar wrote:

> Ok so what about putting lower limit to 125 and increase upper limit 200

Or even just 150.  That would be fine.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/