[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150625142908.GN14071@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:29:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] regmap: add configurable lock class key for
lockdep
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:21:43AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs.
> wouldn't it be better to use the mutex_lock_nested() and co to
> explicitly express your hierarchy?
That was one of my original suggestions - one of the problems with this
code is that it's very much been presented as "here's the solution", it
took a long time to even discover the problem they were trying to solve.
I don't know exactly what the issue is supposed to be here, AFAICT the
answers were about lock classes not about subclasses because apparently
it's essential that we use lock classes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists