[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wrfj4mlvoo24.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:33:23 -0400
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To: David Decotigny <ddecotig@...il.com>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723au: core: endianness issues
David Decotigny <ddecotig@...il.com> writes:
> The code shows a couple inconsistencies (described in commit
> descriptions) which would not be an issue on little-endian cpus, but
> could cause breakage on non-LE cpus. Note: I could not test on real
> hardware, these patches created based on sparse reports.
>
> Hostory:
> - resending the same patches to correct recipients, only changed
> commit descriptions (credits to Dan Carpenter)
>
> ############################################
> # Patch Set Summary:
>
> David Decotigny (2):
> staging: rtl8723au: core: avoid bitwise arithmetic with forced
> endianness
> staging: rtl8723au: core: remove redundant endianness conversion
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Looks fine to me, however if you fiddle with this same value twice,
wouldn't it be better to do it in one patch?
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists