[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC5umyjOZgRz2FF0skXMuKFLMtbnMO5Hdx0pkvBUaHk2+QfAng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:35:26 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] blk-mq: establish new mapping before cpu starts
handling requests
2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
> Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
>> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
>> (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1). Now CPU1 is just onlined and
>> a request is inserted into ctx1->rq_list and set bit0 in pending
>> bitmap as ctx1->index_hw is still zero.
>>
>> And then while running hw queue, flush_busy_ctxs() finds bit0 is set
>> in pending bitmap and tries to retrieve requests in
>> hctx->ctxs[0].rq_list. But htx->ctxs[0] is ctx0, so the request in
>> ctx1->rq_list is ignored.
>
> Per current design, the request should have been inserted into ctx0 instead
> of ctx1 because ctx1 isn't mapped yet even though ctx1->cpu becomes ONLINE.
>
> So how about the following patch? which looks much simpler.
OK, I'll try this patch to see if the problem disappears.
> ---
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index f537796..2f45b73 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1034,7 +1034,12 @@ void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, bool at_head, bool run_queue,
> struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = rq->mq_ctx, *current_ctx;
>
> current_ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
> - if (!cpu_online(ctx->cpu))
> + /*
> + * ctx->cpu may become ONLINE but ctx hasn't been mapped to
> + * hctx yet because there is a tiny race window between
> + * ctx->cpu ONLINE and doing the remap
> + */
> + if (!blk_mq_ctx_mapped(ctx))
> rq->mq_ctx = ctx = current_ctx;
>
> hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, ctx->cpu);
> @@ -1063,7 +1068,7 @@ static void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct request_queue *q,
>
> current_ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
>
> - if (!cpu_online(ctx->cpu))
> + if (!blk_mq_ctx_mapped(ctx))
> ctx = current_ctx;
> hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, ctx->cpu);
>
> @@ -1816,13 +1821,16 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
> */
> queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) {
> /* If the cpu isn't online, the cpu is mapped to first hctx */
> - if (!cpu_online(i))
> + if (!cpu_online(i)) {
> + ctx->mapped = 0;
> continue;
> + }
>
> hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
> cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->cpumask);
> cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->tags->cpumask);
> ctx->index_hw = hctx->nr_ctx;
> + ctx->mapped = 1;
> hctx->ctxs[hctx->nr_ctx++] = ctx;
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 6a48c4c..52819ad 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ struct blk_mq_ctx {
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> unsigned int cpu;
> - unsigned int index_hw;
> + unsigned int index_hw : 16;
> + unsigned int mapped : 1;
>
> unsigned int last_tag ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> @@ -123,4 +124,9 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> return hctx->nr_ctx && hctx->tags;
> }
>
> +static inline bool blk_mq_ctx_mapped(struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + return ctx->mapped;
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists