[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558FDBB7.3030301@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:34:15 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block-skd: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the
function call "kfree"
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:15:46 +0100
>
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/block/skd_main.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/skd_main.c b/drivers/block/skd_main.c
> index 1e46eb2..c4b0259 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/skd_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/skd_main.c
> @@ -3998,8 +3998,7 @@ static int skd_acquire_msix(struct skd_device *skdev)
> return 0;
>
> msix_out:
> - if (entries)
> - kfree(entries);
> + kfree(entries);
> skd_release_msix(skdev);
> return rc;
> }
>
Would anybody like to integrate this update suggestion
into another source code repository?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists