[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150629105853.GE28334@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:58:53 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dasaratharaman Chandramouli
<dasaratharaman.chandramouli@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, msr: Allow read access to /dev/cpu/X/msr
On Sun, 28 Jun, at 12:10:49PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > Is it easier to blacklist MSRs we don't want generally exposed, or only expose
> > the ones that we think are safe? That's sort of a devil's advocate sort of
> > question ;) and I'm wondering what the shorter list is.
>
> The only way to make MSR access safe is to allow it only by whitelisting.
> The x86 platform restricts all MSR access to ring 0 for a damn good reason.
Blacklisting also breaks horribly if you run old kernels on new
hardware.
We need to "fail-closed" if someone tries to access an MSR the kernel
doesn't know about.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists