[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435577009.9587.53.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 04:23:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core] perf tools: Add missing break for
PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 13:12 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Missing switch break since introduction of new event:
> c4937a91ea56 perf tools: handle PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES
[]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
[]
> @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ int machine__process_event(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event,
> case PERF_RECORD_AUX:
> ret = machine__process_aux_event(machine, event); break;
> case PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START:
> - ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event);
> + ret = machine__process_itrace_start_event(machine, event); break;
> case PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES:
> ret = machine__process_lost_samples_event(machine, event, sample); break;
> break;
trivia: There's a duplicate/unreachable break;
on the PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES case
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists