[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150629083302.GA13113@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:33:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Subject: Re: [all better] Re: regression: massive trouble with fpu rework
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 08:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > *
> > Ok, so could you please move the fpu__init_system() further up and see which
> > position is that starts breaking with the BIOS option set?
> >
> > here's the current, broken layout of the code:
> >
> > get_cpu_cap(c);
> > [0] fpu__init_system(c);
> >
> > if (this_cpu->c_early_init)
> > this_cpu->c_early_init(c);
> [0] is the only spot that breaks box.
I bet it is that
/* Unmask CPUID levels if masked: */
if (c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model >= 0xd)) {
if (msr_clear_bit(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID_BIT) > 0) {
c->cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
get_cpu_cap(c);
}
}
in early_init_intel(). If you feel like playing, you might comment it
out to see what happens.
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists