[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435567273.2900.2.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:41:13 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Subject: Re: [all better] Re: regression: massive trouble with fpu rework
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 10:33 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 08:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > *
> > > Ok, so could you please move the fpu__init_system() further up and see which
> > > position is that starts breaking with the BIOS option set?
> > >
> > > here's the current, broken layout of the code:
> > >
> > > get_cpu_cap(c);
> > > [0] fpu__init_system(c);
> > >
> > > if (this_cpu->c_early_init)
> > > this_cpu->c_early_init(c);
>
> > [0] is the only spot that breaks box.
>
> I bet it is that
>
> /* Unmask CPUID levels if masked: */
> if (c->x86 > 6 || (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model >= 0xd)) {
> if (msr_clear_bit(MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
> MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_LIMIT_CPUID_BIT) > 0) {
> c->cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
> get_cpu_cap(c);
> }
> }
>
> in early_init_intel(). If you feel like playing, you might comment it
> out to see what happens.
I'll poke after I get back from physical tort^Wtherapy.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists