lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:41:31 +0200
From:	Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@....de>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>,
	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
	Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>, Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>,
	Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
	Daniel Jeong <daniel.jeong@...com>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...il.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
	"G.Shark Jeong" <gshark.jeong@...il.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Ingi Kim <ingi2.kim@...sung.com>,
	Jan-Simon Moeller <dl9pf@....de>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, John Lenz <lenz@...wisc.edu>,
	Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>,
	Kim Kyuwon <q1.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kristian Kielhofner <kris@...sk.org>,
	Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
	Márton Németh <nm127@...email.hu>,
	Nate Case <ncase@...-inc.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Nick Forbes <nick.forbes@...epta.com>,
	Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
	Peter Meerwald <p.meerwald@...-electronic.com>,
	Phil Sutter <n0-1@...ewrt.org>,
	Philippe Retornaz <philippe.retornaz@...l.ch>,
	Raphael Assenat <raph@...com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...nedhand.com>,
	Rod Whitby <rod@...tby.id.au>, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
	"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
	Simon Guinot <sguinot@...ie.com>,
	Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC RESEND] leds: Use set_brightness_work for
 brightness_set ops that can sleep

On 06/30/2015 01:41 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 30.06.2015 11:27, Jacek Anaszewski пишет:
>> On 06/29/2015 05:17 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:> 29.06.2015 17:05, Jacek Anaszewski пишет:
>>>> +         * If need to disable soft blinking delegate this to the
>>>> +         * work queue task to avoid problems in case we are
>>>> +         * called from hard irq context.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        led_cdev->flags |= LED_BLINK_DISABLE;
>>> Wouldn't it be better to just enforce the callers
>>> to explicitly disable software blink, so that it to
>>> never happen from irq context? Something like in this
>>> patch:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/13/491
>>>
>>
>> Blinking can be disabled not only by removing trigger explicitly,
>> but also by setting brightness to 0 and led_set_brightness
>> can be called from hard irq context. set_brightness_work
>> was originally introduced exactly for this use case.
> Could you please describe where does this happen?

This in fact doesn't take place in the mainline kernel,
however there are some out of tree users apparently [1].
We could remove this possibility, just give me a reason
why we should do that? If we removed it, we would force
any potential driver wanting to call led_set_brightness(LED_OFF)
from hard irq context to use the work queue on its own.

Modifications I am proposing also need set_brightness_work,
so there is almost no cost of keeping the support for calling 
led_set_brightness from hard irq context intact.

> I can see LED_OFF happening only in led_heartbeat_function(), but
> it doesn't use soft-blink, so it will not activate the delayed
> timer cancel.
>
> I would suggest the patch below to make it explicit that
> led_heartbeat_function() doesn't want to cancel soft blink.
> Note that led_heartbeat_function() already uses led_set_brightness_async()
> in a normal case.

With the new approach it should call led_set_brightness_nosleep there.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-heartbeat.c b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> index fea6871..0f89d12 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-heartbeat.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static void led_heartbeat_function(unsigned long data)
>   	unsigned long delay = 0;
>
>   	if (unlikely(panic_heartbeats)) {
> -		led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> +		led_set_brightness_async(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
>   		return;
>   	}
>
>

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg00006.html

-- 
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ