linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:58:14 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"abhimany@...eaurora.org" <abhimany@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: TTY: hvc_dcc: Add support for ARM64 dcc

Will Deacon wrote:
> Well, it's up to you to figure out the details, but I'd start by adding
> some static inlines to the arch-specific header files for enabling/disabling
> userspace access.
>
>  From there, I think I'd get the architecture init code to reset the thing
> to "disabled" (so it's disabled regardless of whether we build the hvc_dcc
> driver) and then if you wanted to go all-out, we could have a sysfs entry
> provided by the driver to toggle it on and off.
>
>> >static int __init hvc_dcc_console_init(void)
>> >{
>> >#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>> >	u32 val;
>> >
>> >	asm("msr mdscr_el1, %0	"
>> >	"orr %0, %0, #4096	" /* TDCC */
>> >	"msr %0, mdscr_el1	"
>> >	: "=r" (val));
>> >#endif
>> >
>> >But this seems clunky.
> Yeah, that's super ugly.
>
>> >I am concerned about KVM, though.  There appears to be code in KVM in
>> >hyp.s and sys_regs.c that touches and/or emulates MDSCR_EL1.
>> >
>> >On a side note, it does not appear that ARM32 blocks userspace DCC.  I
>> >don't see where DBGDSCR.UDCCdis is set.
> That's a bug imo.

So wouldn't it be more appropriate to have a separate patch that handles 
disabling of user-space DCC for ARM32 and ARM64?  All I really want to 
do at this point is provide basic DCC support for ARM64, just like we 
have for ARM32.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/