[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5591E12E.7060007@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:22:06 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
driver support
On 30.06.2015 02:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
> cpufreq driver for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos
> specific cpufreq support for these platforms can be removed.
>
> Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 --
> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 -
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 17 ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c | 210 -----------------------------------
> 5 files changed, 242 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c
Nice diff stat, I like it!
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Few thoughts:
1. Javier's email has changed, CC-ed the correct one. Can you update it
in all patches (CC-tags)?
2. It looks like the patchset should go through one tree so the
Exynos5250 cpufreq support won't disappear, right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists