[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <3020078.iPsxHyMrL0@amdc1976>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:26:57 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos5250 specific cpufreq
driver support
Hi,
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 09:22:06 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30.06.2015 02:26, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Exynos5250 based platforms have switched over to use generic
> > cpufreq driver for cpufreq functionality. So the Exynos
> > specific cpufreq support for these platforms can be removed.
> >
> > Based on the earlier work by Thomas Abraham.
> >
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 --
> > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 -
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 3 -
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.h | 17 ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c | 210 -----------------------------------
> > 5 files changed, 242 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c
>
> Nice diff stat, I like it!
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>
> Few thoughts:
> 1. Javier's email has changed, CC-ed the correct one. Can you update it
> in all patches (CC-tags)?
Done in v3.
> 2. It looks like the patchset should go through one tree so the
> Exynos5250 cpufreq support won't disappear, right?
Right, this would be an ideal situation.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists