linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: unisys: virtpci: fixed a brace coding style issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:27:49 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Sohny Thomas <sohnythomas@...o.com>
Cc:	benjamin.romer@...sys.com, david.kershner@...sys.com,
	bryan.thompson@...sys.com, erik.arfvidson@...sys.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	sparmaintainer@...sys.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: unisys: virtpci: fixed a brace coding style
 issue

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:05:45AM +0530, Sohny Thomas wrote:
> 
> FIX 2 unnecessary braces found by checkpatch.pl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sohny Thomas <sohnythomas@...o.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c
> index d5ad017..f3674de 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c
> @@ -190,9 +190,10 @@ static int write_vbus_chp_info(struct spar_vbus_channel_protocol *chan,
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	off = sizeof(struct channel_header) + chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset;
> -	if (chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset == 0) {
> +
> +	if (chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset == 0)
>  		return -1;
> -	}
> +
why you are inserting new line here?

>  	memcpy(((u8 *)(chan)) + off, info, sizeof(*info));
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -484,10 +485,10 @@ static int delete_vhba(struct del_virt_guestpart *delparams)
>  
>  	i = virtpci_device_del(NULL /*no parent bus */, VIRTHBA_TYPE,
>  			       &scsi.wwnn, NULL);
> -	if (i) {
> +	if (i)
>  		return 1;
> -	}
> -	return 0;
> +	else
> +		return 0;
No, now this will introduce a new checkpatch warning that "else is not
required after return". why did you introduce this "else"?

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/