linux-kernel - [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1435832026-19918-1-git-send-email-ranamazharp@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu,  2 Jul 2015 15:43:46 +0530
From:	Mazhar Rana <ranamazharp@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com,
	gospo@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	Mazhar Rana <ranamazharp@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	sanket.shah@...eroam.com, mazhar.rana@...eroam.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not working properly

When "primary_reselect" is set to "failure", primary interface should
not become active until current active slave is up. But if we set first
member of bond device as a "primary" interface and "primary_reselect"
is set to "failure" then whenever primary interface's link get back(up)
it become active slave even if current active slave is still up.

With this patch, "bond_find_best_slave" will not traverse members if
primary interface is not candidate for failover/reselection and current
active slave is still up.

Signed-off-by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.rana@...eroam.com>
Reviewed-by: Sanket Shah <sanket.shah@...eroam.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 19eb990..ac71261 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
  */
 static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
-	struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
+	struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary, *curr;
 	struct list_head *iter;
 	int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
 
@@ -724,6 +724,14 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 	    bond_should_change_active(bond))
 		return primary;
 
+	/* We are here means primary interface is not candidate for
+	 * reslection/failover. If currenet active slave is still up
+	 * then there is no meaning to traverse  members.
+	 */
+	curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+	if (curr && curr->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
+		return bond->curr_active_slave;
+
 	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
 		if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
 			return slave;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/