[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150702162528.GK4001@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:25:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/17] x86/entry: Add new, comprehensible entry and
exit hooks
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:03:11AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Nothing, actually. We could spin forever if we keep scheduling in and
> having TIF_NEED_RESCHED get set before we check again, or we could
> even, in principle, keep delivering more and more signals forever.
> This seems quite unlikely, though, and if we really end up delivering
> infinite signals, something is very wrong already.
And if it hasn't happened already with the current code, then I guess
we're always catching a break. And it's not like we're not preemptible
for the whole looping duration so not a problem even for -RT.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists