[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150703143703.GB19284@katana>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 16:37:03 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock
from event handler"
> So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the
> broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as
> broadcast device.
We use the same board. Just my kernel has SMP=n.
> Though the issues you see in the highres=n case might be the same as
> the ones Simon is observing.
I hope so. One good thing about the issue I see is that it is 100%
reproducable.
> So in that nohz=y highres=n case, does adding idle=poll on the command
> line fix the issue?
Nope, still hangs.
Thanks for assisting!
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists