[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS+omCaQp8k41rRQeamsAg9Zn1w5jM_7x5XiQfdM==4D7bQDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:28:17 +0800
From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
To: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Ricky Liang <jcliang@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: mediatek: Add USB clock support in MT8173 APMIXEDSYS
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 23:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> This looks like 3 separate gate clocks in a chain, with a timing
>> constraint: USB_LPF must be enabled 100 us after USB_TX.
>>
>> 26MHz--> [GATE] --USB_TX--> [LPF] --USB_LPF--> [GATE] --USB_OUT-->
>> ^ ^ ^
>> +--------------+ | |
>> AP_PLL_CON2.REF2USB_TX_EN -+ | |
>> AP_PLL_CON2.REF2USB_TX_LPF_EN -+ |
>> AP_PLL_CON2.REF2USB_TX_OUT_EN --------------------+
>>
>>
>> I think we can model the gate parts using a proper clock tree model
>> and the existing clock gate semantics.
>> I'm not sure the best way to model the delay; but in theory that could
>> be handled by the clock user (USB driver).
>
> Do you mean to create 3 hierarchical clocks (may be clock gates) to
> model these clocks as the following ?
>
> EN -- LPF -- OUT_EN
>
> (EN is the parent of LPF, and LPF is the parent of EN)
>
> If we model these 3 clocks like above, we can't prevent clock users to
> enable OUT_EN directly, and there will be no delay between EN and LPF.
>
> Or you have other suggestions to model these 3 clcoks?
I don't really know.
I was hoping someone would know of a way to add a "delay" when
enabling a clock gate. :-)
Why do we need the delay anyway?
Is the delay really between LPF and OUT_EN?
Or, is the delay between enabling OUT_EN and when the USB block can
use the clock?
Some ideas:
(1) Handled the LPF delay in the USB driver itself:
(a) if the delay is really between OUT_EN and when it is used:
/* Enabling USB_OUT will enable its parents, USB_LPF and USB_TX */
clk_enable(clk_usb_out);
udelay();
(b) Or if the delay is really needed between LPF and OUT, this can
be implemented in the USB driver:
/* Enable LPF and its parent USB_TX */
clk_enable(clk_lpf);
udelay();
clk_enable(clk_usb_out);
(2) Add a "delay" property to "struct mtk_clk_gate", with a non-zero
value for just this one special LPF clock. The downside is then every
gate clock would have to carry this extra field.
(3) Add a new clk type, struct mtk_clk_delayed_gate, that includes a
struct mtk_clk_gate, plus a delay. I would add this to its own file,
or maybe clk-gate.c, though, rather than mediatek/clk-mt8173.c. And
then use this for instantiating the LPF clock.
-Dan
> Best regards,
>
> James
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists