linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] at91: use request_irq/free_irq instead of setup_irq/remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Jul 2015 23:48:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	David Dueck <davidcdueck@...glemail.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com,
	ludovic.desroches@...el.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wsteinwender@....com,
	antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com, mail@...n.io, c.emde@...dl.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] at91: use request_irq/free_irq instead of
 setup_irq/remove_irq

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, David Dueck wrote:

> This fixes a warning when using RT-Preempt.

That's not a proper explanation for the patch and by all means it
cannot fix anything because free_irq() is just a different wrapper
around __free_irq() than remove_irq(). So how on earth fixes that the
problem at hand?

Thanks,

	tglx





 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/