[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507052326100.3916@nanos>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 23:28:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Ankit Gupta <ankgupta@...eaurora.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
agross@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net, rdunlap@...radead.org,
standby24x7@...il.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gavidov@...eaurora.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, mlocke@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] trace/events: add chip name and hwirq to irq entry
tracepoint
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +
> > +#define show_chip_name(irq) \
> > + (irq_get_irq_data(irq) \
> > + ? irq_get_irq_data(irq)->chip->name \
> > + : "NULL")
> > +
> > +#define show_hwirq(irq) \
> > + (irq_get_irq_data(irq) \
> > + ? irq_get_irq_data(irq)->hwirq \
> > + : -ENODEV)
>
> Note these magic functions will only be useful for the tracefs reads of
> the trace files. Userspace tools that extract the data (like perf and
> trace-cmd), will have no idea of how to parse it.
>
> I'm not against doing this, but I'm just letting you know what the
> effect of this change will be.
What's worse is, that they are racy against a concurrent teardown of
the interrupt. Not a good idea ...
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists