[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150706104815.GA17305@dhcppc13.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:18:15 +0530
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wcohen@...hat.com" <wcohen@...hat.com>,
"dave.long@...aro.org" <dave.long@...aro.org>,
"steve.capper@...aro.org" <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbols
On 06/07/2015:10:03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 06:03:21AM +0100, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > Add all function symbols which are called from do_debug_exception under
> > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL, as they can not kprobed.
>
> It's a shame this has to be so manual, but I suppose it's done on a
> best-effort basis to catch broken probe placement.
>
> If we miss a function and somebody probes it, do we just get stuck in a
> recursive exception, or could we print something suggesting that a symbol
> be annotated as NOKPROBE?
In some cases we land into a recursive reenter_kprobe:
echo "p kfree" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo "p single_step_handler" >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/enable
[ 116.904194] BUG: failure at
.../arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c:288/reenter_kprobe()!
In some other
echo "p kfree" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo "p el0_sync" >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/enable
Infinite loop of:
[ 142.731336] Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1
In 1st case currently only address is printed.
pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", p->addr);
So, while in 1st case we may also print name of symbol, we can not do
much in second case.
Now, I am running some test with all the symbols in /proc/kallsyms and
I noticed that there might be few more symbols which may not allow
kprobing. So, may be I will resend this series with updates.
~Pratyush
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists