[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559A6075.5070502@hitachi.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:03:17 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wcohen@...hat.com,
dave.long@...aro.org, steve.capper@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Make all entry code as non-kprobe-able
On 2015/07/06 14:03, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Entry symbols are not kprobe safe. So blacklist them for kprobing.
As I've said, you can also use _ASM_NOKPROBE().
This patch itself looks good to me, but I'd like to ask arm64
maintainers' opinion, whether they accept introducing entry-text
section only for this purpose or not.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index a7691a378668..2ea24f6bc06b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ tsk .req x28 // current thread_info
> * Exception vectors.
> */
>
> + .section ".entry.text", "ax"
> .align 11
> ENTRY(vectors)
> ventry el1_sync_invalid // Synchronous EL1t
> @@ -737,3 +738,5 @@ ENTRY(sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper)
> mov x0, sp
> b sys_rt_sigreturn
> ENDPROC(sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper)
> +
> + .section ".text", "ax"
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 6c9f8b5f04ce..9bc02c151f7f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/sections.h>
>
> #include "kprobes.h"
> #include "kprobes-arm64.h"
> @@ -661,6 +662,14 @@ int __kprobes arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + return (addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
> + addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end) ||
> + (addr >= (unsigned long)__entry_text_start &&
> + addr < (unsigned long)__entry_text_end);
> +}
> +
> int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index 1fa6adc7aa83..11fb2b0117d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ SECTIONS
> *(.exception.text)
> __exception_text_end = .;
> IRQENTRY_TEXT
> + ENTRY_TEXT
> TEXT_TEXT
> SCHED_TEXT
> LOCK_TEXT
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists