linux-kernel - Re: [patch] irqchip/dw-apb-ictl: Fix generic domain chip wreckage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507061450210.3916@nanos>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2015 14:55:43 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] irqchip/dw-apb-ictl: Fix generic domain chip wreckage

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > the following patch seems fix the panic, but I dunno whether it's correct or not,
> > could you please help to check?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Jisheng
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > index f4a0e11..8d996cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > @@ -30,13 +30,14 @@
> >  static void dw_apb_ictl_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> >  {
> >  	struct irq_domain *d = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, 0);
> > +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> >  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> >  	int n;
> >  
> >  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> >  
> > -	for (n = 0; n < d->gc->num_chips; n++, gc++) {
> > +	for (n = 0; n < d->gc->num_chips; n++) {
> > +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, n * 32);
> >  		u32 stat = readl_relaxed(gc->reg_base + APB_INT_FINALSTATUS_L);
> 
> Yes it's correct. Seems I tried to be overly clever by avoiding the
> lookup of the second chip. Will fold back.

Hmm. That does not make sense because the real issue is here:

-       for (i = 0; i < nrirqs / 32; i++) {
+       for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(nrirqs, 32); i++) {

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/